The team of IP Consulting successfully succeeded in deletion of the improper registration of a Bulgarian trademark which was registered in contradiction with the absolute grounds for trademark registration under the Bulgarian Law on Marks and Geographical Indications, namely: The deleted BG Trademark Reg № 63996 is a word trademark and consists of a combination…
CPC forbids the imitation of the famous trademarks “TO4NITE” and “Tochnite taksita”
Imitation: Decision No 226/24.02.2011 of Commission for Protection of Competition (CPC) Claimant: Hepi OOD – client of IP Consulting Ltd. Respondent: Milanov Taksi 8111 EOOD CPC initiates a procedure through correspondence No. CPC/977/2010 at the request of Hepi OOD against Milanov Taksi 8111 EOOD to ascertain the fact of infringement of rights according to Articles…
Sofia Civil Court: the symbol “Matraci TEK” infringes the rights of the trademark ” Matraci TED “
Decision No. 3/08.02.2011 – Sofia Civil Court (SCC), CD, VI-3 panel Commercial lawsuit No. 1191/2010 Claimant: TED INVEST EOOD – client of IP Consulting Ltd. Defendant: „AS I KO” ООD The claimant TED INVEST EOOD states that it owns a registered trademark Matraci TED with reg. No. 41080 – combined, registered for goods from class…
The registration of a sign with revoked Bulgarian State Standard as a trademark in not in BAD FAITH!
Decision No 164/08.02.2011 – Sofia Civil Court, CD, VI-14 panel Commercial Lawsuit 1596/2010 Claimant: Meat Factory Karlovo AD Defendant: BELLA BULGARIA AD – client of IP Consulting Ltd The claimant Meat Factory Karlovo AD states that on 3.02.2010 received a letter from BELLA BULGARIA AD with which the defendant claimed infringement of word trademark Osym….
Commission on Protection of Competition: Rivals shall not limit the using of a registered trademark by its legitimate owner
Decision No. 806/13.07.2010 of the Commission on Protection of Competition Claimant: Orgahim AD Defendant: Megahim AD – client of IP Consulting Ltd. The Commission on Protection of Competition (CPC) has started proceedings on correspondence No CPC 169/04.03.2010 on the grounds of Article 94 (1) in relation to Article 38 (1), point 3 from the Protection…