EUIPO entirely rejected opposition No. 3 094 752 against all the goods of European Union trade mark application No 18 039 001 (figurative). Its proprietor Izvor Relax EOOD is represented by the team of IPConsulting Ltd. The opposition is based on two trademarks – European Union trade mark registration No 9 407 123 and French…
DECISION No EX-20-1 of the Executive Director of EUIPO of 14 February 2020 concerning the extension of time limits
The Executive Director of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (the Office), Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark(1) (EUTMR) and in particular Article 157(4)(a) thereof, pursuant to which the Executive Director of the Office must take all…
European union trade mark rejected for all the contested goods
Representing its client Revuele Ltd., IP Consulting filed an opposition against all the goods of European Union trade mark application No 15 183 403. The opposition is based on, inter alia, international trade mark registration No 1 119 310 designating Bulgaria. Likelihood of confusion The contested goods are various cosmetics and cosmetic preparations used on…
APPOINTMENT OF EUROPEAN TRADEMARK ATTORNEY IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE EUIPO (for applicants outside the EEA (European Economic Area)
With regards to the need to appoint an European Trademark attorney (professional representative) in proceedings before the EUIPO (European Intellectual Property Office) the EUTMR (European Trade Mark Regulation) divides the applicants in two categories.
A case for the existence and validity of an earlier right within the meaning of Article 8(2) EUTMR
The opponent filed an opposition against some of the goods and services in Classes 30 and 35 of European Union trade mark application for the figurative mark The applicant is represented by the team of IP Consulting. The opposition is based on European Union trade mark application and French trade mark registration, both for the…
